We spent Saturday with our friends Maia and Oriol in Sitges, a beach town about half an hour south of Barcelona. Sitges is known for delicious seafood, a salad of bitter greens with romesco sauce and anchovies called xató, and a large concentration of gay male sunbathers.

Bathing suits optional.

Here are the pictures Maia was able to take in between shots ruined (enhanced?) by a nude and shamelessly exhibitionist sexagenarian who tried to insert himself into the background at every opportunity.

Ivy and  Matt were married in the beautiful Brooklyn Botanic Gardens last week, and we were happy to be there to celebrate with them.

For those with a morbid sense of curiosity, or perhaps an overdeveloped spirit of adventure, take a look at the latest mashup application from the New York Times, the “New York City Homicides Map.”

A murder near Sunset Park in Brooklyn. That’s my old apartment between the crosshairs, indicating its proximity to the crime.

This Flash application combined a database of information about murders from the past six years, including the age of victim and perp, primary motive, and weapon, with a cheery Google Maps interface. You can search the map by time of day, weapon used, or go directly to your street address and watch the violence rage around the little red crosshairs that indicate the location of your home.

These crosshairs might be a bit a too tongue-in-cheek for such a grizzly app.

Overkill aside (get it????), the ability to offer interactive maps of data like this has to be a huge factor in the survival of newspapers. The map links to an article about a related topic, and the article directs readers to visit the website and explore the database. Readers can also comment on their own observations of the data in the paper’s City Room blog.

How can newspapers offer online content of increasing quality, such as this murder map, without finding a way to monetize it? On the other hand, how can they afford to keep their doors open without the lure of high quality content?